<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NVIDIA announces ultra-high end NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gadgetlite.com/2008/12/08/nvidia-announce-ultra-high-nvidia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gadgetlite.com/2008/12/08/nvidia-announce-ultra-high-nvidia/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:01:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay anand</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetlite.com/2008/12/08/nvidia-announce-ultra-high-nvidia/comment-page-1/#comment-50348</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gadgetlite.com/?p=3859#comment-50348</guid>
		<description>nice one. but huge amount :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice one. but huge amount <img src='http://www.gadgetlite.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetlite.com/2008/12/08/nvidia-announce-ultra-high-nvidia/comment-page-1/#comment-17020</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gadgetlite.com/?p=3859#comment-17020</guid>
		<description>anon your retarded, its not for games, none of nvidias gaming cards could come anywhere near a FX4800 in raw rendering power, its just for rendering for like, cgi movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anon your retarded, its not for games, none of nvidias gaming cards could come anywhere near a FX4800 in raw rendering power, its just for rendering for like, cgi movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetlite.com/2008/12/08/nvidia-announce-ultra-high-nvidia/comment-page-1/#comment-15169</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gadgetlite.com/?p=3859#comment-15169</guid>
		<description>First off, there is a faster Quadro card, the FX 5800: http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_quadro_fx_5800_us.html

Second, a $200 GTX 260 will smoke the FX 4800 in games - it won&#039;t even be close. Likewise, a GTX 280 will be faster than an FX 5800 (albeit not by all that much)

The GTX 295, however, will easily best all of the above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, there is a faster Quadro card, the FX 5800: <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_quadro_fx_5800_us.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_quadro_fx_5800_us.html</a></p>
<p>Second, a $200 GTX 260 will smoke the FX 4800 in games &#8211; it won&#8217;t even be close. Likewise, a GTX 280 will be faster than an FX 5800 (albeit not by all that much)</p>
<p>The GTX 295, however, will easily best all of the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Age</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetlite.com/2008/12/08/nvidia-announce-ultra-high-nvidia/comment-page-1/#comment-12644</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Age</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 12:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gadgetlite.com/?p=3859#comment-12644</guid>
		<description>Wow, awesome! The price tag is quite heavy though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, awesome! The price tag is quite heavy though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

