Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanTradueix al català/Catalanहिन्दी अनुवाद करने के लिए/HindiÖversätta till Svensk/SwedishOversetter til Norsk/NorwegianПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese TraditionalTraduzca al Español/SpanishTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduza ao Português/Portuguese日本語に翻訳しなさい /Japanese한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean中文翻译/Chinese SimplifiedПереклад на українську/Ukrainian Home » Cell Phones, Gadgets

Video explains why your iPhone 3G is slower than the one on TV…

Posted on August 18th, 2008 by Editorial Staff in Cell Phones, Gadgets

Have you been having the same question that many have had since your iPhone 3G was first unboxed when you got it? It seems many have been wondering why the speed of the new iPhone isn’t as fast as expected and it didn’t take long for this video to be made. Here’s a video which will probably solve your question, it basically shows you the ad that attracted everyone to buying the latest ‘twice as fast’ iPhone and compares it to the ‘real world’ iPhone 3G.

Related posts

Subscribe and you can receive our latest articles in your email inbox completely free. Enter your email address below (no spam, we promise!):

We never disclose our subscribers' information without prior consent.

3 Comments »

  • Nain said:

    Nice finding. But is that video real? I mean how Apple can befool the world with help of an advertisement??

    Reply to this comment...

  • Editorial Staff (author) said:

    @Nain

    I couldn’t believe the video myself neither, but its been shown on many other blogs and there seems to be an agreement that this has been the case. The only other ridiculous explanation I can think of is that Apple speeded up their ad in an attempt to shorten the video time to save tv ad fees, but that’s just me!

    Reply to this comment...

  • Nain said:

    Yeah, that could be the correct reason!! Speed up the advertisement to cut down ad fees. Otherwise no company would ever try to befool people that could cost it its brand name.

    Reply to this comment...

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.